1 Samuel 26:1-28:25 + John 11:1-54 + Psalm 117:1-2 + Proverbs 15:22-23
~ Click here to read today’s Scripture on Bible Gateway ~
~ Listen to today’s Scripture with Tom Dooley’s terrific NLT 1996 readings at this link, or The ESV Bible: OT + NT + Psalms + Proverbs ~
Old Testament – In First Samuel 26 David completes the 3 “tests” of obedience, as discussed in yesterday’s post, by once again not killing Saul when he had the opportunity. Verses 9 through 11 again show David’s character when he and Abishai had snuck into Saul’s camp and Abishai offered to kill Saul – “”No!” David said. “Don’t kill him. For who can remain innocent after attacking the LORD’s anointed one? Surely the LORD will strike Saul down someday, or he will die in battle or of old age. But the LORD forbid that I should kill the one he has anointed! But I’ll tell you what–we’ll take his spear and his jug of water and then get out of here!””

Interesting… in First Samuel 28 Saul bans mediums – wise – and then becomes desperate for one – unwise… The medium seems to get quite freaked out that she has called up Samuel. Commentaries suggest that she is used to calling up satanic / demonic forces. She (possibly) connected to Samuel somehow here and was freaked out by it. And Samuel tells Saul exactly what he probably knows in his heart. God has left him – a long time ago – because of his disobedience. Consulting a medium is just one more disobedient act in a string of them. I pray that no one reading this consults mediums or does tarot cards or gets into palm readings or any of that garbage. It is spiritually dangerous and risky to get into any of that. Unfortunately, I know that things like “tarot card reading parties” are somewhat popular today. I have been invited to them and have not gone – and told the hosts why I was not attending. Please avoid this spiritually risky stuff. It is no joke dangerous. Below is a painting by Benjamin West from the year 1777 titled “Saul and the Witch of Endor”:

Bible.org’s commentary on today’s First Samuel readings titled “The Second Time Around” is at this link. Commentary titled “One Step Forward, and Two Backward” is at this link and commentary titled “Finding God’s Will, Any “Witch” Way You Can” is at this link.
New Testament – Today in John chapter 11 verse 35 we read the shortest verse in the Bible – “Jesus wept.” Though this may be the shortest verse, I do not believe it is small in meaning. What does it say to you that Jesus wept? What does it mean to you that Jesus wept? I love this verse because to me it shows Jesus’ humanity (while at the same time he is divine). During his time living as a man on earth, Jesus experienced the full range of emotions that you and I experience today. Jesus was tempted. (though, unlike us, he did not give into temptation and sin ever) Jesus was joyful. Jesus was angry. Jesus loved. Jesus wept. Knowing this about Jesus, does this help you to realize that you can approach Jesus with absolutely any situation in your life that you might be struggling with? Do you believe that Jesus will understand you if you are weeping? Do you believe that Jesus will rejoice with you when you are rejoicing? I do. “Jesus wept” says so much to me about who Jesus was, is, and forever will be. Jesus wept.

Bible.org’s commentary on today’s John chapter 11 readings titled “Dealing with Death” is at this link and “The Raising of Lazarus” is at this link.

Psalms – Psalm 117 is the shortest of all the Psalms – and the shortest chapter in the entire Bible. This Psalm is said to basically be one long Alleluia. 🙂 Actually verse 1 has a very important message – “Praise the LORD, all you nations. Praise him, all you people of the earth.” This demonstrates that God was very interested in the salvation of the Gentiles and all the nations in the Old Testament. And not just in the New Testament as we get to the book of Acts. This was part of the plan all along…

Proverbs – Today in Proverbs chapter 15 verse 22 we read – “Plans fail for lack of counsel, but with many advisers they succeed.” Wow. . . this verse really is convicting for me on a couple of levels. The first thought for me is God – and how often (or not often) do I pray to God for counsel on my plans for my life? Truthfully, not enough. I pray to God daily – but it’s usually pretty brief. I believe God wants us to come to him often in prayer asking for guidance and counsel on our plans. Imagine that – with God as an adviser on our plans, do you think they might succeed?? 🙂 Secondly, I think about community – other people. And I think about, first of all, am I in community? Am I in a community of people that I know well and that know me? And if so, am I consulting this community on my life plans? Am I allowing people I know and love to advise me on my life? Think this would be wise? How about you – do you pray often to God for counsel and leading in your life plans? Are you in community with others that you know well and that know you? And do you consult this community with your plans and ask for their advice?

Worship Video: Psalm 117 reminds me of Michael W. Smith’s “A New Hallelujah!”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBxOkruKpqI
Do you sing Alleluia? Click here and sing!
Please join us in memorizing and meditating on a verse of Scripture today: “Jesus wept.” John 11:35 NIV
Prayer Point: Pray in thanksgiving that Jesus wept like we weep. Pray in thanksgiving that Jesus knows pain and joy, as we do. Pray in thanksgiving that Jesus is our High Priest who like us was tempted in every way, but never sinned, and intercedes on our behalf before the Father.
Comments from You & Questions of the Day: I read an interesting commentary today related to Jesus weeping in John. The commentary basically said that while we have recorded in Scriptures that Jesus wept, we don’t have anywhere recorded in Scriptures that Jesus laughed. I had never thought about that before! The commentary went on to say that they are sure Jesus laughed and had a great sense of humor. But I find that fascinating to think about – that it’s not recorded that Jesus laughed. Why do you suppose this is? Do you think Jesus laughed? Also, what verses or insights stand out to you in today’s readings? Please post up by clicking on the “Comments” link below!
God bless,
Mike
p.s. Download our monthly Small Group study notes for our Bible readings at this link.
p.s. #2 – Download a schedule of our Bible readings for the year in PDF format at this link.
p.s. #3 – I would greatly appreciate it if you would pray for this Bible Blog ministry today! Please also consider partnering with us by financially supporting this ministry. Thank you!
BLOG READERS HISTORICAL COMMUNITY COMMENTS:
(our Group Bible Study is below! : )
======= Ramona:
1 Samuel 26:1-28:25
Two men, on the outside they don’t seem to be different; however, on the inside one has a heart after God, the other’ heart is focused on himself and covered in pride. Both of these men have sin in their lives, both of these men have “missed” it; yet one repents and turns back to God the other doesn’t. One is at war with God the other is at peace. If one were to look at the entire life of both of these men, I think Saul would come up smelling like a rose, while David would be severely condemned. However, the difference can be found in the heart. David wanted to please God Saul wanted to fight Him. Saul fought to keep his name in the limelight by any means necessary; David lifted up God’s name.
Death, necromancers (the witch at Endor), familiar spirits and mediums.
I think everyone needs to take a deep breath and go back and read Jesus’ reply to the Sadducees (Sad-to-sees) who gave Jesus that crazy scenario about the woman who married and outlived seven brothers (Matthew 22:23-29; Mark 12:18-27; Luke 20:27-40). The bottom line is this, those that die a physical death, in Christ even before Christ physically came upon the earth (Samuel et all) are not dead in God’s sight.
But Jesus replied to them, You are wrong because you know neither the Scriptures nor God’s power. For in the resurrected state neither do [men] marry nor are [women] given in marriage, but they are like the angels in heaven. But as to the resurrection of the dead–have you never read what was said to you by God, I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob? He is not the God of the dead but of the living! [Exod. 3:6.] (Matthew 22:29-32 AMP)
As far as man is concerned now, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are long dead but Jesus reminds us that God spoke of them as being in the hear and now. God said I am the God of … Not I was the God …. We, I believe, in my humble opinion have the wrong understanding of what death is. Cessation of life is not death; being removed from the presence of God is death. We are made in the image of God and God is Spirit not flesh. Who we are, is not who and what we are in “flesh” but in spirit. Our spirits our born again, not our flesh. Our flesh will be redeemed and put back together again in a form that will be incorruptible, like Jesus’, when Jesus comes again.
The witch/medium of Endor had no plans or inclination of bring up Samuel that is why she screamed. She wasn’t expecting the real Samuel. Remember Jesus’ story of Lazarus and the rich man? (Luke 16:19-31). Each of them recognized each other, Abraham, Lazarus and the rich man AFTER DEATH but they were not dead; however, the Rich Man had a location problem, he was in the wrong location removed from the Presence of God. .
And do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul; but rather be afraid of Him who can destroy both soul and body in hell (Gehenna). (Matthew 10:28 AMP)
When the Lamb broke open the fifth seal, I saw at the foot of the altar the souls of those whose lives had been sacrificed for [adhering to] the Word of God and for the testimony they had borne. They cried in a loud voice, O [Sovereign] Lord, holy and true, how long now before You will sit in judgment and avenge our blood upon those who dwell on the earth? [Gen. 4:10; Ps. 79:5; Zech. 1:12.] Then they were each given a long and flowing and festive white robe and told to rest and wait patiently a little while longer, until the number should be complete of their fellow servants and their brethren who were to be killed as they themselves had been. (Revelation 6:9-11 AMP)
Also something to think about, if death, physical death is so atrocious for the believer, why would Samuel be upset to be called back into the land of the physical living. He said that they had disturbed him.
This is not what I had initially decided to focus on, but reading the posts led me down this path.
Grace and peace,
Ramona
P.S. Someone, I’m sorry I can’t remember who, asked about Jesus being the first raised from the dead when others, like Lazarus in the John reading had been brought back to life. Well again, we need to be clear on what “death” Jesus is talking about. Yes, Jesus brought back people from the dead, and by the way so did the prophets Elijah and Elisha; however, all those folks died a physical death, again. Jesus was the only one who came back to physical life but will NEVER die a physical death again. Those who are His will also be clothed with a body that will be eternal and incorruptible when He returns.
Oops! I forgot about the witches; familiar spirits and mediums.
Each of these things deal with death, something that well, scares us to death. We don’t know what is on the other side; however, God has told us what He has prepared for us but He left no solid proof. That is why we operate by faith. Witches, familiar spirits and mediums allege to tell us what God won’t. This is the same thing that happened in the Garden, “Did God say …?” We are enticed into this realm of demonic activity because deep down inside we believe God is keeping us in the dark, He’s pulling a fast one. It’s not demonic because it’s spooky and eerie; it is demonic because it is in the realm of Satan. I think I stated this before, There are only two Kingdoms; The Kingdom of God or the Kingdom of Satan. Everything in the Kingdom of Satan is demonic. In the Kingdom of God, Jesus is Lord; In the kingdom of Satan, Satan isn’t Lord—self is Lord.
Here is something to think about, what is a medium. It is someone who alleges to stand between the living and the dead. The problem is that anyone who operates in these modes are DEAD, spiritually dead. If Believers, God’s folk—His people, go to one of these to find out “stuff,” they are talking to dead folk (spiritually dead) about well dead folk (physically dead and possibly spiritually dead also). There is someone who stands between the living and the dead and it ain’t no medium it is Jesus Christ.
Familiar spirits are those demonic spirits that have hung around your family, region, country through the ages and know everything about you. That’s why they are familiar and you are comfortable with them being around. If someone or something gives you a “word” you best know how that “word” lines up with the Word. We are suppose to walk by faith not by our senses, feelings and emotions.
Witches are just necromancers; folks hanging around dead stuff and dead folk. Why if Jesus is the Truth and the Life, why would we want to rub shoulders and elbows with death when we have Life?
And when the people [instead of putting their trust in God] shall say to you, Consult for direction mediums and wizards who chirp and mutter, should not a people seek and consult their God? Should they consult the dead on behalf of the living? (Isaiah 8:19 AMP)
What we are really concerned about our loved ones who we may or may not see in heaven, bottom line. But guess what, when you get to heaven, if those folks are saved you will see them; if not, you won’t remember. There will be no tears shed in heaven.
Grace and peace,
Ramona
====== Ann:
======= Jeff:
This is my first comment to your blog. Below is what I posted today on the One Year Bible site my church is using this year as we read through the Bible together(as you are doing). Would appreciate any replies.
Fellow Seekers,
The story today of Jesus’ resurrecting Lazarus from the dead (John 11) has triggered many thoughts regarding miracles:
1. Did Jesus really resurrect Lazarus after he was dead for 4 days (see verse 39)?
– If so, this event is definitely the most amazing miracle that Jesus ever performed (aside from His own resurrection of course).
As such, then why is Lazarus’s resurrection excluded from the other 3 gospels?
– John states in verse 54 that this was Jesus’ last event in His public ministry before His own betrayal, death, and resurrection. This appears to contradict the other 3 gospels which make Jesus’ throwing the money-changers from the temple the final catalyst before He is arrested.
2. Did Jesus really heal the man that was blind since birth (John 9)?
– If so, this healing miracle is the most amazing healing miracle that Jesus ever performed. As such, then why is it only told in John and not the other 3 gospels?
3. Why is it that 2 of the most amazing miracles attributed to Jesus are told only in John? If they are true, they are so fantastic that they certainly would have been widely known and would have been more
than worthy for inclusion in the gospels of Matthew and Mark and Luke. Is it possible that John is stretching the truth in these 2
stories?
4. The other aspect of John’s gospel that I am having trouble reconciling with the other 3 gospels is his concept of Jesus and God being the same (see John 1:1-2 and John 10:30 for example). In the other 3 gospels isn’t Jesus seen more as having been created by God
(e.g. the “Son of God”). Question: Excluding the gospel of John, does the rest of the Bible primarily support the trinitarian concept of Jesus as God incarnate or was Jesus created by God?
P.S. I’m not asking you for definitive answers to these questions because I realize they are very involved. But I would appreciate any thoughts you might have on these topics.
Thanks folks.
Jeff
======= Ramona:
Jeff, The writer of Hebrews states, Now faith comes by hearing and hearing by the Word of God. If we were able to explain everything that Jesus and God did, there would be no reason the have, worship or need God.
The witness of one event by several people, even a crowd, will not elicit the same explanation or descriptive narratives by every one who saw the event, just ask any policeman or detective, People write what they think is important. Each one of the writers of the Gospels wrote for very different reasons and it is from their motivating factors that gave birth to what they focused on with the help of the Holy Spirit.
From my own experiences there are two kinds of knowledge. There is knowledge that comes by way of empirical science and the five senses, that kind of knowledge needs no faith. Then there is “revelation” knowledge and that is what I believe and know for myself, it takes to understand the Bible. When we get further into the book of John, Jesus addresses this kind of knowledge.
Hope this was helpful. I am not a theologian and my own experience in The Faith has come through “revelation” knowledge.
Grace and peace,
Ramona
======= Jeff:
Thanks. Yes, that was helpful. Nevertheless, I’m still an inquisitive human that seeks to understand the Bible as completely as possible so that what I believe (i.e. my faith) is as true as it can possibly be.
If I had to depend solely on revelation to receive answers to my questions, I fear my knowledge would be very limited and the truthfulness of that knowledge very, very questionable.
Anyones thoughts or insights on the following would be sincerely appreciated:
The other aspect of John’s gospel that I am having trouble reconciling with the other 3 gospels is his concept of Jesus and God being the same (see John 1:1-2 and John 10:30 for example). In the other 3 gospels isn’t Jesus seen more as having been created by God
(e.g. the “Son of God”). Question: Excluding the gospel of John, does the rest of the Bible primarily support the trinitarian concept of Jesus as God incarnate or was Jesus created by God?
Jeff
======= Mike:
Jeff – Good questions!
Bible.org has a great overview of the Trinity – and even opens this commentary with this first sentence, which gets at your question – “Because the word trinity is never found in the Bible some wonder about whether this is a biblical doctrine or not, but the absence of a term used to describe a doctrine does not necessarily mean the term is not biblical.” Check it out here –
http://www.bible.org/page.asp?page_id=215
Bible.org also has a great discussion called “Major Differences Between John and the Synoptic Gospels”. This will dive into some of your questions of why some things are just in John or vice versa. Check it out here –
http://www.bible.org/page.asp?page_id=1151
Hope these help. Glad to see you asking these questions. God will lead you to answers.
Grace,
Mike
======= Jim:
Some believe that it is too unlikely for the incident involving the opportunity to kill Saul in 1 Samuel 24 to be repeated so closely in 1 Samuel 26:1 and conclude the two narratives are only differing perspectives of the same event. The incidents are similar, but the differences are sufficient to establish that the events are in fact separate. But the much bigger questions are 1) how Saul could turn to black magic when he had already exiled all of the witches and wizards by God’s command (Ex 22:18 and Deut 18:10-11), and, 2) does this suggest that the existence of fortune tellers is biblically supported and that the Spirit of Samuel that was with God actually returned to talk with Saul? What is the difference between a fortune teller (bad) and a prophet (good)? First is the source of the knowledge and second is the purpose (one is to allow you to control the future and the other is to b you change to prepare for it). Clearly the Lord “stirred” (1 Sam 26:19) things up by sending an evil spirit to trouble Saul as punishment for his sin (1 Sam 16: 1, 14). Saul is so consumed by anxiety and fear (specifically opposite to how “real” believers are “free” from sin) that he purposely sins with only confirmation of what he already knows (the spirit of Samuel only tells Saul what he told him while alive). Samuel asks Saul what can anyone do for a person God has left as a consequence of wrong actions. This is similar to Jesus’ parable when Abraham tells a rich man that it would be futile to send the dead Lazarus to warn his bothers (Luke 16:27-31). Anyone not willing to believe Moses will likewise not believe a voice from beyond the grave.
David tells Saul that by seeking God’s pardon and offering a sacrifice that he could ask for removal of the evil spirit. Similarly, David says he could offer an atoning sacrifice to God if there was any offense on his part (but if evil men making false accusations were the cause of Saul’s hostility, they would be judged). David, however, placed no value in Saul’s blessing in v 26:25 (as addictions to alcohol, drugs, sex, violence, or food are not just examples of poor choices but of choice and fidelity having been surrendered) and sought refuge with the king of Gath (who no doubt hoped to encourage the split between David and Saul and welcome hiring David’s 600 skilled fighting men as mercenaries). It is important to remember in our darkest moments that there is always a way back to a relationship with God. In 1 Corinthians 10:13, God explains that when His children are tempted, He always provides a means of escape in order to replace wrong behavior with right behavior. We are reminded that the faith of even the greatest saints can falter and that we may need to prove steadfast to the right things while waiting on God timing. We must stay close to the Lord so that when we need His help most, it will be available.
David is successful not by his own efforts and skills but by his faith in God. David trusted that God was in control so that even when he faced his greatest challenges, he always had the greatest confidence, “the battle is the Lord’s.” God’s sovereignty is not only to be believed but to shape our behavior. David’s killing of every person of the old enemy nations does help to ensure that his lying about raiding Judah is not discovered, but it is also continued fulfilling of God’s holy war to drive these doomed people (whose religious practices have been shown by archeologists to include cult prostitution and child sacrifice) from the land (see Ex 23:24 and Josh 13:2-3) to protect Israel from temptation. The OT national covenant provided the payoff for obedience of health and long life (Ex 23:25-26) as the NT individual covenant provides for spiritual health and survival. Even if wise to shun pubic notice, it is never wise to be idle. David doesn’t outright agree to join Achish in war among the Israelites, but he also dares not to outright refuse.
Saul, on the other hand, living under the Zadok rival priesthood to Abiathar, unable to get guidance from God, was in a panic (terrified to despair, he is still not humbled) with the Philistines posed at Shunem with superior weapons (Israel without the technology of iron as it had be banned for so long). Why should God answer a king who had shown he will not obey? Saul calls for a retired medium of necromancy (consulting the dead to determine the future), an art specifically forbidden by the law (Lev 19:31). The medium shrieks with surprise and fear when Samuel actually appears from Sheol or “the place of departed spirits” hints that the woman truly believed God had permitted the spirit of Samuel to speak and announce Saul’s imminent death (Saul faints – the wicked always fear death) and that she understood the potential personal consequences for being involved. Saul’s recognition, the accurate prediction, and revelation for the woman of Saul’s identity all suggest that validity of the apparition (this is one OT example of many supporting conscious life after death that makes it difficult for me to understand why all my Jewish friends, like the Sadducees, fail to believe in an immortal soul). Sheol (the place for both the righteous and the wicked – Samuel tell Saul that he and his children will soon be with him) is said to have gates which prohibit the normal escape of a spirit and this is the only instance recorded in the OT of someone making it out (even if only temporarily) – the NT describes total escape in the first and second resurrections of Revelation.
Mike is very correct in stating that mediums, fortune tellers, and their tools are no joke. We often think of spiritual games as being very old, but these are actually only measurements of our recent moral decline. For example, Weegee (Ouija or talking) boards is the second most popular board game in America that even those knowledgeable in “The Craft” often consider too dangerous to use, and never play with themselves, only goes back about 150 years. Tarot cards are less than 500 years old but only picked up a dark association again in the mid 1800’s (when there were more free-sex communes than in the 1960’s as the basis for many American companies, like Hershey and Oneida). Wiccans similarly like to think of their religion as very old, but it is a potpourri of elements from as many ancient religions as possible only in the past 50 years (there are very few witches whose parents were Wiccan) and should not be confused with biblical witchcraft. Popular films and television programs, such as The Craft (where spells were intentionally done with mistakes to keep viewers from real powers), Practical Magic, Sabrina the Teenage Witch, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Harry Potter, Blair Witch Project, Free Spirit, The Worst Witch, Teen Witch, Sorceress, Witchcraft 1-8, The Witch’s Daughter, Sleepy Hollow, Teen Sorcery, Simply Irresistible, and Charmed, are aimed at attracting children (especially girls, as most characters are very pretty young females) to this growing religion. In these portrayals, being a witch is akin to being a superhero (or “naturally born” witch with gifts everyday, ordinary “Muggles” lack) as expressed in the Wiccan story, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone: “There is no good and evil, there is only power and those too weak to seek it.”
I did a search (in 2002) and found 2,904 different Wiccan Yahoo newsgroups to share spells to control and more spells to free one from the first spells. Control seems to be a very big draw for Wiccan believers. Countless sites even outright state that evil can be transmuted into good in a similar fashion to medieval alchemy (clearly making the religion about using “dark” power for “good”). Most of the newsgroups contain online stores where you can buy books about every religion, except, of course, Judo-Christianity because Judo-Christianity (besides Satanism) is the only major world religion that formally recognizes witches (in both in the Old and New Testaments). Popular Wicca book titles in the first few of those newsgroups included, “Nice Girl’s Book of Naughty Spells,” with spells that teaches women how to have it all: sex and money while dumping the useless boyfriend and “Power Spells” on how to get the upper hand in any situation. Other highly marketable items include candles, incense, herbs, staffs, rattles, wands, drums, crystals, pentagrams, and a lot of porn (because forced ritual sex is very important to the religion – “a gift from the Goddess”). And since lying, forced control over others, casual sex, drugs, and disobedience are encouraged by the religion, its hard to imagine what Wicca followers might consider an evil deed to be (there seems to be a lot of support for the idea of victimless crimes – a concept I find most objectionable). One of the major differences, however, with pagan concepts of morality is that they are based on Don’ts. For example, many sites posted the Wicca golden rule as stating the negative, “don’t do to others what you don’t want them to do to you” rather than the more positive and proactive Christian version of, “do to others what you would hope them to do to you.” Most sites suggested that there’s no difference between the two. “Real” morality, however, can only be found exactly in the empathetic responsibility for others that comes from that difference. Being “good” is not about not harming, but about proactively providing assistance for other’s needs. It is also the key difference between selfish and selfless individuals and cultures. Practicing witchcraft or playing such games actually makes one a Christian except with the associated value system turned upside down (just as Darth Vader is a Jedi knight except for an opposite set of values). Wiccans “do not seek any repentance” (Wicca, I guess, means never having to say you’re sorry – it’s certainly about never asking for forgiveness or accepting grace). The core belief is one of a low differentiation pantheism where there is little difference from person to person, person to god, or good to bad. Low differentiation, however, is specifically referenced by psychiatrists to identify poor mental health.
A key part of New Age and Wiccan beliefs is that we are leaving the Age of Pisces that began about the time of Christ and are now entering a new world order of one government, one language, and one religion where everyone will be recognized as gods as we enter the Age of Aquarius during this century – which is very similar to Christian end-time predictions. The Key of Solomon is one of the most famous of all magical Wicca textbooks. It is supposedly written by the Biblical son of David – again noting the close tie between Biblical and Wiccan identities. The Key of Solomon provides lessons to students of the craft in using the positions of Jupiter for acquiring all that one can desire, Mars to cause “ruin, slaughter, cruelty, discord, to wound, and to give death” and summoning souls from Hades (especially those of violent deaths), Sun for wealth, favor of princesses and (with Jupiter and Venus) for invisibility, Venus for joyous undertakings, poisons and provocation of madness, Mercury for fortune telling, thefts, deceit, and merchandise, Moon for envoys and nocturnal visions, Saturn (with Mars and the Moon) for summoning Spirits and stealing back what has been stolen by others and experiments of hatred, enmity, quarrel, and discord, and Mercury for experiments in raillery and jests. Such use of the stars is not uncommon in the Bible as the three Magi wise men bearing gifts for Christ were likely members of a priestly class of Persians who had occult knowledge and power, adept at astrology, dream interpretation, fortune-telling, and mediation with the spirit world.
John 11:35 is my favorite biblical verse (for one thing, it’s short enough even for my feeble brain to remember – although 1 Thess 5:16 is shorter in the Greek). A doctor who sees death and pain day in and out eventually becomes immune to the effects. Christ, on the other hand, knew that Lazarus would die and had seen death a trillion times before and knew that his soul and body would be reunited as personal evidence to His great claim, “I am the Resurrection and the Life,” a lesson of the result of sin, and so dangerous (v 10:31) to eventually end in His own death (v 11:50-53) but was overwhelmed by the sadness of the family and moved to tears (imagine, a God that cries). Every pain we feel, God feels right along with us, as if it was the very first feeling. Every sunrise is seen by the Lord as if it was likewise the very first. In Michelangelo’s rendition of creation for the Sistine Chapel at the Vatican, God should be depicted as the hoping child and man as old and weary. What kind of person would force a young child to watch someone else sin, but this is exactly what every Christian does to God when we choose to sin. It is Jewish custom (called “shivah” for seven days) to morn for the death of a family member with friends at home for a week, abstain from adornments for three weeks, and common pleasures for a year. Preparation of the dead was done the very day of death and by women, and thusly done here by Lazarus’ sisters. Luke (v 10:38-42) adds some information on the two sisters, Mary (the placid woman who later pours perfume with her hair on the Lord’s feet) and Martha (the active one, of course, it the one to greet Jesus). These sisters had assumed that Jesus would immediately respond to their message about Lazarus’ illness (as if He didn’t already know), but he had instead waited on his Father’s time. Jesus spoke about the danger of going to Bethany but that one who lives by the will of God will always be safe. It is living in the realm of evil that is truly dangerous. John marks the growth of the hostility step by step (5:16; 7:1, 32, 45; 8:59; 9:22; 10:39) – it is ironic that these men believed they could put to death permanently One who could raise the dead. Compare Jesus’ compassion with Caiphus’s statement that the death of one person meant nothing for the safety of the nation (suggesting concern over the Roman fear of rivalry when it was really the Sanhedrin’s fear of rivalry that was the problem). “For he loves us with unfailing love; the faithfulness of the LORD endures forever. Praise the LORD!”
Dear Jeff, Here is a man dead and buried, bound tightly, and Jesus “wakes” him four days later. Is one miracle greater than any other (except when He took God’s wrath for our sins on His shoulders and overcame death through His resurrection) when no sin is greater than any other (ALL warrants death)? Each of the Gospels are from four very different people, Matthew the evil tax collector, Mark who knew Jesus as a nine-year old child, John the most-beloved, and Luke who never met Him but was the first Christian historian speaking from first-hand witnesses. Each also had a different purpose and so it is reasonable that they each tell the good news in different ways, but in all four Gospel Jesus has the power to forgive sin, miracles from God, power over evil, know our thoughts, to calm nature, and the authority to teach us how to pray (and so forth and so on). Remember His baptism in Luke when the word of God identified Jesus as His Son. Jesus claimed in many places outside of the Gospel of John to be the Son of God (such as Luke 22:70), but OT scripture confirms it as well (some of which I’ve listed previously). I cannot understand your problem “reconciling” the other three Gospels as I don’t see where they are in conflict. I would suggest that you take this in earnest prayer to Jesus directly. You are right to assume that answers must come from more than one just revelation and that faith comes first from reason – “Let us reason together, saith the Lord” (Isaiah 1:18), “But solid food belongs to those who are of full age, that is, those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil” (Hebrews 5:14), and “Examine yourselves to see whether you are in the faith; test yourselves. Do you not realize that Christ Jesus is in you – unless, of course, you fail the test?” (2 Corinthians 13:5). God has no need for yes-men and yes-woman (that’s Satan, duh). Scripture demands, in fact, that anyone claiming to have spiritual gifts or messages from God must submit to public and objective rational testing before employing by multiple accepted authorities (“let two or three prophets speak, and let others pass judgment.” – 1 Cor 12:29). Nothing disgusts God more than lukewarm blind-faith Christians that he vomits, in Revelation, out of His mouth.
But faith (a spiritual gift from the Holy Spirit so it is not something anyone can build but only develop) is more than critical thinking based on the facts (although salvation isn’t). Do parallel lines meet at infinity? If you say no, you get a valid mathematics, and if you say yes, you get a valid mathematics. The only situation in which you do not get a valid mathematics is if you refuse to answer because of being angry over how could anyone know for sure. What kind of stubborn person (the agnostic), though, would live without mathematics simply to be “right?” You have to choose. In addition, however, how can you claim to love another without seeing more in that person than you have experienced already (can’t you love a completely useless infant without any justification) – how can you have love without faith (you can’t have math). Have you never known another’s faith (not just trust) in you? Truth, love, and God all require faith and any verse of the Bible can exchange any of these three words and mean the same thing. People in failing relationships usually complain that the other person is controlling, condemning and judgmental, always angry, untrustworthy, and unable to listen. God has had similar complaints about us by complaining that His people are “far away” (Isaiah 29:13), “unfaithful” (Joshua 22:16), “proud and perfectionistic” (Deuteronomy 8:14; Palms 36:2), “unloving” (1 John 4:20), and “judgmental” (Romans 2:1). God reaches out to us for relationships as the object of His love and is clear on who He is. He is for honest relationships based on truth and love and against oppression, injustice, sin, and evil. While all religions involve mankind reaching up to God, only Jesus was really about how God reaches down to us. Jesus demonstrated relationship needs when he asked the disciples to stay and keep watch while he prayed and by his great pain when they failed him. People with relationship barriers usually don’t recognize internal problems, leaving those who do care (such as Jesus) feeling discouraged and distant (usually, in fact, with far greater pain and discomfort than the person with the problem). One of the most surprising facts about the bible didn’t require me to read the book but I only got after doing so. The Moslems take Jesus (as well as all the leaders from every religion) as one of their 250,000 to 2.5 million Islamic “prophets.” Jesus is the only one I know of, though, that didn’t feel he needed to dictate or write anything directly to us (Mohammed and Buddha, for example, were prolific authors) – there is no book in the Bible entitled, “Jesus.” He seems to be the only one of history’s religious leaders who believed enough in a personal relationship with God that he didn’t think we would get it wrong on our own (no being “good enough” required, thank God). The Bible is good, but IMHO the relationship comes first.
How would you like to be going to the moon and have the navigation system shut down for 20 minutes, because the first astronauts had to normally suffer through exactly that more than a half dozen times during each flight. This was because the 4k of memory in the computer was not big enough for all of the navigation requirements and it took 20 minute to boot the next code segment (yes, computer hardware back then was so slow it took 20 minutes to load 4,000 characters!). NASA could have spent their money (and capsule space) on more memory but instead installed three computers so that when any one system disagreed with the other two it could be shut down or rebooted. This was because the wrong answer scared them more than no answer! The Church’s biggest problem has always been a lack of fear about wrong answers while exhibiting an unhealthy indiscriminate fear of debate (causing them to be anti-science). God provides three sources of truth (or computers) through His Word, the experiences from a direct relationship along with our own intelligence, and community within the body. Many people have heard silly things from God, misinterpreted the Bible, or gotten bad advice from a friend, but most could have gotten quickly straighten out if they had only looked harder at the other two for confirmation. Isaiah 30:21 says, “Your ears shall hear a word behind you, saying, ‘This is the way, walk in it,’ Whenever you turn to the right hand or whenever you turn to the left.” Thus, God will speak, and you can hear His voice, but you must be careful (especially when you are a young Christian) that you objectively confirm that you are following the Holy Spirit and not another voice. “Where no counsel is, the people fall: but in the multitude of counselors there is safety” (Proverbs 11:14) and “By the mouth of two or three witnesses every fact may be confirmed” (Matthew 18:16). I want you to know that your experience and input is certainly valuable to this group and our learning experience and I look forward to your continued involvement after this first posting. While you don’t want to rely “solely on revelation,” however, it would seem that at this time you may be missing some. In other words, what has God told you when you went to Him directly with these questions? For your question on how we know The Son is the Father is the Holy Spirit (that three separate beings are also one), I would ask that you first start with some simple research, say, with a Google search on the question on “how one God can be three persons” and report back on what you learn.
Jim
======= John:
Dora,
#2 They do come in the form of men. I am just not sure they identify themselves as such. And how do we know which is which if they did? Sylvia “whatshername” claims she deals with angels and spirits all the time. I know the difference she says – “good angels (spirits) give off a bright light” and are beautiful. Really???? And Lucifer is called what?
The supposed miracles of Satan. Well, my understanding is that if a Demon causes something he can undo it. Or when a healing or miracle occurs it does not necessarily last or it is an imperfect cure. Satan is the Great imitator and in all his imitations of God he comes up short or it is flawed. (Just my belief).
Perhaps that is true of Samuel if he was an evil imitation – I just don’t think that was the case – as I posted. But there a good many godly people who go along with you on your premise.
“Don’t Satan and his angels know exactly what has happened and can relay that to the witches?”
Exactly.
#3 Rapture. Best discussed at a later date when we get to the appropriate text in the New Testament.
Dora,
#1)Eccl 9:5
“The living know that they shall die, but the dead know not anything.”
Agree with Ramona and had an excerpt from commentary below. Context and message are important. My understanding of this is that the dead know nothing of the earthly life anymore. The life they have lived “under the sun” is over. Their earthly rewards are all they got, and they are done. Dead and done.
Vs. 4 has the idea I was looking for:
“Anyone who is among the living has hope..”
======================================================
The living at least know that they will die, but the dead don’t know anything about what’s going on in the world.
This verse is constantly used by false teachers to prove that the soul sleeps in death, that consciousness ceases when the last breath is taken. But it is senseless to build a doctrine of the hereafter on this verse, or on this book, for that matter. As has been repeatedly emphasized, Ecclesiastes represents man’s best conclusions as he searches for answers “under the sun.” It sets forth deductions based on observations and on logic but not on divine revelation. It is what a wise man might think if he did not have a Bible.
What would you think if you saw a person die and watched his body as it was lowered into the grave, knowing that it would eventually return to dust? You might think, That’s the end. My friend knows nothing now; he can’t enjoy any activities that are going on; he has forgotten and will soon be forgotten.
MacDonald, W., & Farstad, A. 1997, c1995. Believer’s Bible Commentary : Old and New Testaments . Thomas Nelson: Nashville
John
































































I have a question if you don’t mind?
It is about 1 Samuel 28- The part were Saul goes to a Medium to find out what is going to happen the next day and according to the bible he gets the woman to bring Samuel up from the dead to speak to him . Question being are not all Mediums and conjourers all from satan ? If so how did Samuel come to be there and be party to this evil act?
I have looked up many commentaries but they are all contradictory , would like to hear what your impressions of this passage are. Thank you for all your help.
Ann
====== Leroy:
Question being are not all Mediums and conjourers all from satan ? If so how did Samuel come to be there and be party to this evil act?
Question 1: No!
Question 2: Because God wanted to send Saul a message!
Leroy
====== Michelle:
I disagree with the first answer to this question.
Saul had no business going to a conjurer/medium/witch. It was strictly prohibited by God. Saul has made many poor choices in his life that are dangerous to follow and this is one of them.
The fact that it seems that the witch seems to have connected with the real Samuel is a surprise even to her. This is not the usual way of things and in fact Samuel doesn’t give Saul what he is looking for. He basically tells him it’s too late for him–he should have consulted and obeyed the man of God when he had the chance.
Following are the scriptural prohibitions on spiritists that I copied from the bible.org article link that was listed.
First, God has strictly forbidden the use of mediums. A number of Old Testament texts forbid the presence of mediums and other spiritists in the land of Israel and also forbid the Israelites to consult such persons. Consider these prohibitions in the Law of Moses:
“‘Do not turn to mediums or spiritists; do not seek them out to be defiled by them. I am the LORD your God’” (Leviticus 19:31).
“‘As for the person who turns to mediums and to spiritists, to play the harlot after them, I will also set My face against that person and will cut him off from among his people’” (Leviticus 20:6).
“‘Now a man or a woman who is a medium or a spiritist shall surely be put to death. They shall be stoned with stones, their bloodguiltiness is upon them’” (Leviticus 20:27).
10 “There shall not be found among you anyone who makes his son or his daughter pass through the fire, one who uses divination, one who practices witchcraft, or one who interprets omens, or a sorcerer, 11 or one who casts a spell, or a medium, or a spiritist, or one who calls up the dead. 12 “For whoever does these things is detestable to the LORD; and because of these detestable things the LORD your God will drive them out before you. 13 “You shall be blameless before the LORD your God. 14 “For those nations, which you shall dispossess, listen to those who practice witchcraft and to diviners, but as for you, the LORD your God has not allowed you to do so” (Deuteronomy 18:10-14).
Michelle
====== Romayne:
My views on the medium issue – while I fully concur it is prohibited by God for us to contact the dead, He appears to allow (in certain circumstances) the dead to contact the living. I had an experience after my hubby died where I ‘felt’ he was talking to me (in my mind just – no visitation), and the ensuing ‘conversation’ was very spiritual where ‘he’ continually exhorted me to put Jesus first, and to know that we would indeed soon be joined together in God (he was a Christian too). I actually ‘prayed against’ Satan twice in the early part of this encounter as I really was so unsure of its source, but Stephen insisted it was him, and said he understood why I had to do that. The more interesting point of this ‘encounter’ was that Stephen told me he was only being given one opportunity to talk to me, and I was under no circumstances to ‘seek him out’ i.e, through mediums (not that I ever would have anyway). Finally I wrote down the entire conversation 8 hours later and know it was accurate (incredible for me who forgets what I did or said 2 hours ago!), and gave it to a solid fundamentalist minister to assess his opinion of the whole thing. He considered it to be okay because 1) I hadn’t sought the encounter in any way and 2) the contents of it were very ‘Jesus oriented’ – and continually exhorted me to put Jesus first etc, along with some other confirmations.
So, while 8 years on, I now look back at that and start to have some doubts about it, I would still hold that God can allow the dead to contact the living in certain cases and maybe in various ways, although part of me would still be very wary about it.
===================
What I marvel at in some respects regarding Saul’s case, is that having just been given a definite prophecy by Samuel about what’s going to happen the next day and how – Saul doesn’t consider changing his plans in any way – was he unable to do so for some divine reason, or is it just another testimony to the fact that we cannot change our future no matter how much we might like to – if we’re going to die tomorrow, it will happen no matter what we decide to do, and/or even if we know about it in advance. It’s also interesting too from the other angle of current day affairs – those who go to mediums etc now, would very much change their routine or lifestyle if told to do so or given ‘knowledge’ of some future event possibly happening. At the very least, they would end up living their lives totally stressed out worrying – precisely why God has never granted us the ability to know what lies ahead. Makes for a much less stressful life. Just think how tough it can be if you know you’ve got a tough meeting with your boss in 2 days time, or you’re going to get test results tomorrow etc – way much worse if you knew something really bad or tough to deal with was going to happen up ahead.
==================
Then looking at the NT story of Lazarus – listening to it once more, just made me think about something I was vehemently against not so long ago, but now am going to go and re-research – soul sleep! I’d always gone with the ‘camp’ that states – “absent from the body, present with the Lord”, which asserts that you are fully awake, aware and corpus mentus at the instant of death and thereafter, which I do feel seems right. But then, listening to Jesus saying that Lazarus has only fallen asleep, makes me wonder. Seems a bit strange to consider that Lazarus might have died, actually gone to heaven only to be told that he’s not going to stay there, but has to return to his body for Jesus to have His glory shown to the waiting crowd. Yet, I equally wonder was Lazarus a purely special case in respect of death and resurrection and/or was the possible concept of ‘soul sleep’ only a reality BEFORE the resurrection of Jesus??
Anyone want to comment on these concepts? Love to hear alternate views or links to other sites which might prove useful for continuing my research into the last one. Thanks.
Romayne
======= Anka:
Mediums…I thought when Samuel died he went to heaven..so that meant he was with God.God had taken a stand on mediums…seeking out mediums was never his will.It would suprise me that God would make an exception for Saul by letting the spirit of Samuel be summoned by a worker of satan thereby assisting in the breaking of a law He had made.Did Saul after all he did go to heaven?I’ve really not seen Saul have a relationship with God at all(except when he needed something).The Samuel the medium brought up said Saul and his sons would be together with him….Well,did Samuel have the right to judge who was going where after death?But the most disturbing question to me is…would God use satan’s agents (after refusing to speak to Saul)to communicate…If God said no mediums then let Samuel go “prophesy”…isn’t that breaking his own law….
I haven’t had the time to read Bob’s commentaries but this is one time I’ll say “God if this is true,show me yourself cos it just doesn’t sound like it’s you”.
I have to admit the statement Jesus made”this sickness is not unto death”is kind of puzzling because Lazarus did die because of the sickness….and as Romayne pointed out…the issue of the soul sleeping..that’s a pretty hard piece of meat to chew.
At the same time…to the unbelieving Jews…the saw the blind man healed,now Lazarus….truly they had no excuse not to believe.It brings us to the question of those who believed…what was so different about them.Jesus said that nobody can come to Him unless the father draws him near…must say I’m having a hard time with this bit….would really love get other insights.
God bless you all
Anka
======= Romayne:
Back to the mediums – Anka, I tend to think that while mediums are indeed most likely deluded by, at the very least, and totally sold over to at worst, Satan, God has only said to us that we are not to contact the dead, NOT that it’s not possible though – if anything this episode with Samuel to me shows it is indeed possible, and that quite likely those on the ‘other side’ know more about the future perhaps and if we could indeed contact them we would know more than we should again. However, I do believe that for the most part mediums do only contact demonic spirits masquerading as dead loved ones, hence those who use them in some sense are paying for their sin twice – they’re going to be deluded firstly, and judged by God secondly. But like you, I do wonder why God allowed it – or indeed why bother doing it through a medium – if He wanted Samuel to appear to Saul, I would have imagined He could just have done it Himself rather than having Saul commit the additional sin of seeking out the medium. As you say – just throws up yet more questions.
Same with your second query – sounds a bit like the Calvinistic concept of predestination – that only those God elects can actually ever come to Him (which I disagree with) and if you’re elected you couldn’t decide not to submit and accept Jesus. I think it’s more a case that the person is already considering their options, which allows the Holy Spirit room to move in their lives and reveal the Truth to them which they then have the choice to accept or reject. Others may disagree, but before anyone shouts at me for being in the opposite camp (Armenian) I’m not – although Methodist, I disagree with its beliefs too – I’m what I fondly call a Calvinistic Armeniast (apologies for sp). Basically I would believe in a middle viewpoint.
Anyway – hopefully some others might be online soon to discuss and debate these questions further. Appreciate your input tho Anka.
Romayne
====== John:
Saul at Endor
“Question being are not all Mediums and conjourers all from satan ?”
I am not sure what “all from satan” means? A medium that CAN contact the spirit world would work through “familiar spirits”. These are demons (fallen angels) who have been around since Satan’s fall. They are not dummies and have extensive knowledge of the subjects that are targeted for contact. “Familiar Spirits” can give detailed information from the deceased person’s life and the interactions with the person desiring contact. Hence the term “familiar”. They can imitate the voice and materialize looking like that person.
That being said – I think most mediums can be classified as non-believers in Christ. They are used by Satan and his minions to influence people’s thoughts about the afterlife. The mediums (especially today) think they have this great gift and are using it for good. They think they have it all figured out, but today’s mediums (and maybe the OT ones) are just pawns in Satan’s game plan – to make people think they get it right (about the afterlife) – reincarnation, everyone in a happy place, spirit staying on earth, etc.- as long as they never go to Christ. NOTE: You will never see a clairvoyant or medium today who claims to contact the dead make comments endorsing the gospel or Jesus. Anything but that! that is enough to raise a red flag for me.
So, I do not think it is right to say they are “all from Satan” as much as they are being used and manipulated by Satan and his minions.
As Micah and Sue said – contacting the spirit world is a no-no. Micah’s citings are absolutely correct. Today there is only one spirit we are to be contacting, and that is God – through the only intercessor and mediator the Bible acknowledges – Jesus Christ.
I base the above on comments by Erwin Lutzer, John Macarthur, and David Jeremiah, and a little reading on the subject.
I believe that people see aliens, have recordings of spirit voices (EVP), that contact with the spirit world is possible and has happened, and that apparations have appeared on earth – I just believe it is all done by “familiar spirits” (demons) who try to twist and turn what goes on in the Universe and after death to spin the story away from God and Jesus.
Saul at Endor II
As “anonymous” said, there is conflicting opinions in commentarieas on what went on here. I acknowledge that, and would like to just point out some things I noticed.
1)vs 12. When the woman saw Samuel, she cried out at the top of her voice…”
The woman (medium) is either a charlatan or for real.
– if a charlatan than she must have been shocked at what she saw regarding Samuel. She was probably going to try and play (con)Saul regarding Samuel and information Saul wanted.
– if for “real” then something bothered her a great deal. Perhaps the normal contact with a “familiar spirit” did not play out as usual, and Samuel’s appearance was a great deviation from the norm.
I base this on the Hebrew word “za`aq” translated “she cried”. This verb is in the Hebrew Qal Imperfect and is translated”
a) to call (to one’s aid)
b) to cry, cry out (in need)
In a loud voice she called or cried out “in need” or “for aid”. Why would this woman if experianced need “aid” or be “in need”. I would propose that something radically different from the norm is going on in her job of contacting “spirit”.
2) “the woman saw Samuel…Then Saul knew it was Samuel…Samuel said to Saul” excerpts from NIV.
“Saw”, “knew”, “said” all Hebrew Qal tense and all mean what we think they would mean in English.
Jesus just said in John that:
(Part of John 10:35)
“-and the Scripture cannot be broken-“
So I conclude it is Samuel. In addition, a “familiar spirit” COULD recount all the past info Samuel did to Saul. However familiar spirits have no power to know the future. So, by Samuel fortelling the future (accurately) is further proof to me that it is Samuel speaking to Saul.
So the BIG Question is WHY? Why did God allow Samuel to arise from Sheol/Hades)? (I am with Ramona that the Lazarus/rich man story is not a parable but an instruction as to what the afterlife consisted of before the Cross.)
I don’t know. My guess is that it was done for effect. That Saul being away from his troops would be in a “different place” mentally. If Samuel appeared back in camp, maybe Saul would have broke camp and run, or gone to food and drink or sleep. Afrter Samuel finished. it says Saul’s strength was gone, he had fasted (by accident or on purpose???). Perhaps if he had been in camp and had food and been strong – he would have played off Samuel, God and the predictions and made excuses as Saul had been known to do in the past. In this setting Saul was forced to reflect on Samuel’s words, and his mortality, and perhaps – repent.
The big prediction is Saul and his sons would be dead on the morrow. WOW! If you knew that what would you be doing the night before and all the next day? Maybe this was Saul’s last chance to repent.
Scripture does not tell us if Saul repented (at least I don’t think so) and people discuss it all the time as to Saul’s fate. Samuel said, “and tomorrow you and your sons will be with me”. I believe Samuel is in Sheol on the Abraham side. Jonathan would certainly be on that side after his death? Would Saul? Or would Saul be on the rich man’s side of Hades suffering and in torment. We simply do not know. It all depends on if Saul turned back to God, repented and “believed”.
Sue,
Ramona posted:
“Jesus was the only one who came back to physical life but will NEVER die a physical death again. Those who are His will also be clothed with a body that will be eternal and incorruptible when He returns.”
Like Ramona said – Christ is the first that died and would never die again. His resurrection broke the “sting” of death” – showing there is eternal life. Something he has been preaching all through John.
All your cited passages refer to that concept:
Acts: rise and show the light or knowledge that there is eternal life.
1Cor: Christ is the firstfruits of them that slept. The first of the harvest of souls that would go to heaven. (look up Jewish offering of first fruits and its symbolism in Christ.)
Col: Christ is the first to ascend to heaven followed by the saints – the church.
Romayne,
Now that I have violated two post rule. 🙁
John 11:12-15
His disciples replied, “Lord, if he sleeps, he will get better.” Jesus had been speaking of his death, but his disciples thought he meant natural sleep.
So then he told them plainly, “Lazarus is dead, and for your sake I am glad I was not there, so that you may believe. But let us go to him.”
I to believe “absent from the body, present with the Lord”, it is just that I think Lazarus was in Sheol as the story lazarus/richman instructs. The Father is omnipresent, so He is there on the paradise side. It is not heaven, but it is a “happy ” place. I guess since non-belief results in separation from God, that although the Father is omnipresent , He is not on the “rich man’s side” of Hades/Sheol. that is why that side of Hades is such a place of torment – especially if they can see the happy side across the chasm.
I do not believe anybody went to heaven until Christ ascended their first.
I will go on record as firmly rejecting the doctrine of “soul sleep”. At death we are not just laying in the ground awaiting judgment day. (At least our spirit/soul is not).
I think we will find ample text (verses) on that as we get further in the New Testament.
BTW Urban legend has it that Lazarus only smiled once after he returned from the dead. Apparently he was not all that pleased to be back from “paradise”. He ended up in Lanarca in Cyprus where his second tomb is located. (you can search: lazarus lanarca cyprus (tomb) to get some interesting reading.
John
====== Sue:
Ramona and John:
Thanks both of you for this information. I KNEW it had to be something I just wasn’t seeing, and you hit the bull’s eye!
This absent from the body and present with the Lord concept is a difficult one for me to grasp. There are so many schools of thought on what happens when we die. We know we will stand before the white throne judgment and God will see Christ’s righteousness, but when? After the rapture? At the moment of death? Then there is all this “near death experience tales” and it gets rather complex, so I cannot quite get my mind around this death thing, but I will reread these and try.
This is why fellowship with the saints is so important to me “…do not forsake the fellowshipping…”
God’s love and blessings.
Sue
====== Dora:
Things to think about:
1) The Bible says that “The living know that they shall die, but the dead know not anything.”
2) Angels sometimes come in the form of men – good angels and bad. The Bible also talks about the spirits of devils working miracles – why would God work with a witch? Think about a fallen angel pretending to be Samuel. He would know all about what had been the life of Samuel and he could very well make someone kill Saul the next day if God didn’t overrule. And how about mediums (witches) helping police solve crimes. Don’t Satan and his angels know exactly what has happened and can relay that to the witches?
3) Is the Rapture Biblical? What do you do about I Thessalonians 5:16,17? Oh, I know what people say, that Jesus has to come back for the body…. but that’s not quite what the Bible says here.
God bless in our continued study to know His truth.
Dora
====== Ramona:
Dora wrote:
1) The Bible says that “The living know that they shall die, but the dead know not anything.”
God didn’t write that Solomon did and he wrote it “under the sun,” not under the Son. You must read the text in context and understand who is speaking: is it God or is it man thinking about God and his works. That statement is based on an observation. This type of thought will also be found in the Book of Job.
I’ll leave the other two points (2 & 3) for someone else or for a latter time. I have to get ready for church.
Ramona
====== Pat:
Years ago when I was teaching Sunday School, we studied this chapter where Saul had the spiritualist call up the ghost of Samuel. Then there were few places on the Internet that charged for readings so I printed out the free readings they predicted for me for the Saturday before the lesson. I avoided all the sites that required me to leave an email address because I did not want future communication with spiritualist! All of the readings were different and they predicted things like coming into money, finding romance, travel, etc. I passed out the readings to the class so they could see how different they were. Everyone got real interested and wanted to know which ones came true. It was not until then that I told the class that none of them came true because I had made arrangements the previous month to have someone come and help me houseclean, and that Saturday was spent washing windows and scrubbing down walls. I stressed the point that all spiritual readings, except for the Scripture, are pure trash and should be treated as trash and to drive the point home I passed around the trashcan for everyone to dump the readings in. God used that lesson to make an impression on the class because there were some in the class that admitted they started each out day by reading their horoscope instead of the Bible! They made a vow right then that they would start out each day with Bible in hand instead of the horoscope in the newspaper. I pray that each of you start your day out with the Word of God to give you the guidance you will need that day.
God Bless!
Pat
======= Dottie:
I find that it is very interesting that the verse Jesus wept, can open our minds to many thoughts. I think about how I grew up and learned that it was not ok to show my emotions, I learned not to cry. Many years went by and horrific things happened in my life, yet I couldn’t cry, even when my mom graduated into Heaven! Then, my first born child, my oldest daughter, passed away unexpectedly and I cried. I cried from so very deep with in me and I thought I would never stop! God spoke to me in that verse, Jesus wept, and I realized that it was alright to cry. I then learned that God saves each of our tears and I was set free from that point. I learnd that tears are cleansing, healing and they gave me a new strength to carry on what I believed in God, to live Spiritually in the world!
I found through obedience to God and following His directions, my life became a life, free from all the cluter, and garbage I had built up in it and carried like a treasure I should save, but now I let it all go and I have freedom.
I now have joy, happines, and peace.
I believe Jesus laughed, it says he attended a lot of weddings and there is a lot of laughter and joy at a wedding!
Dottie
====== Mae:
Knowing this about Jesus, does this help you to realize that you can approach Jesus with absolutely any situation in your life that you might be struggling with? Do you believe that Jesus will understand you if you are weeping? Do you believe that Jesus will rejoice with you when you are rejoicing? ~ Absolutely!!! I know He’ll understand me, I can feel it when I cry! I feel Him comforting me when I cry. It’s a wonderful feeling! He knows my struggles, He can cry with me, He can feel what I feel! And when I’m having my breakthrough and cry from happiness He’s there with me too! Jesus is awesome!!! He knows me so well, He knows how to encourage me, comfort me and bring me where I want to be and most important; keeping me on the right path and bring me where God wants me to be!
Mae
====== Jenny:
1 Samuel is again very interesting…how Saul contacted Samuel and that God permitted this. I definitely believe any kind of palm reading, mediums, tarot card, juigi boards is all occultic and bad news. Christians have no right messing with any of that, but I’d advise all ppl to stay away. Its very real and demonic…its opening the door to the demonic world. I have heard so many stories!
I was reading commentary on Saul bringing up Samuel and it was saying this is the only case in the BIble and any attempt to contact the dead, if it ‘works’ you are really contacting demonic beings impersonating the dead. I have been in such pain from the loss of my best friend that I considered a medium, just to talk to her one time…Even after I knew it would be a demon impersonating her, i was so desperate i considered it, but then rejected it. So I know ppl in loss and pain are very vulnerable. But as christians, God forbids us! we have the choice to disobey but why would we?? This opens the doors to allowing evil spirits in. One of my good friends is not a believer and has seen demons in her house, when she describes it, it sounded terrifying! I spent the night at her apartment once and she left to hang out with the neighbor…the same apartment that the demon was in (she described it in great detail) but I felt no fear, because Greater is HE that is in me, then he that is in the world. I know a demon will not touch me bcos I have not opened those doors and I know they are NO match for Christ…they are terrified. I could tell stories of ppl i know using juigi boards and levitating but i dont want to dwell too much on the evil world. i am aware it exists, i stay away, and thats enough.
“Jesus wept”. I kinda wondered about this verse a while back, why would He weep knowing He would raise Lazarus, but actually He wept because He saw the pain death left others with. He Lazarus’ sisters and friends in such pain and that caused Him great pain. I know when I see ppl I care for crying over their losses and in pain, I cry too bcos I feel their hurt. Jesus, feeling total empathy and compassion is able to comfort us bcos He knows the pain it causes us humans.
I have also heard Jesus was described as having a great sense of humor and being funny. I’m sure Jesus laughed: He was both fully human and fully God.
Jenny
====== Sue:
“David then asked Ahimelech the Hittite and Abishai son of Zeruiah, Joab’s brother, “Who will go down into the camp with me to Saul?”
“I’ll go with you,” said Abishai.”
I find this nepotism very interesting:
1. Ahimelech was Hittite.
2. Zeruiah was David’s Sister
3. Joab and Abishai were the sons of David’s sister, Zeruiah
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * *
As David calls out Saul yet another time, after this time taking Saul’s spear and water jug, again we hear Saul acknowledge his wrongdoing. It puts me in mind of Judah when Tamar was about to be stoned, how Judah acknowledged that she was more honorable than Judah because he would not give her his son to wed.
Then I got to thinking about what Jesus said in “Matthew 18:15 Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother.
16: But if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.
17: And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican.”
David employed this in his first encounter with Saul in the cave (privately), and now he speaks out in front of his men so that all can be party to what is really going on, and it is again remarkable to me how scripture interprets scripture.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * *
We know that Saul was quite aware of his sin in consulting a medium, because just before this he had expelled all the mediums and spiritists.
The witch of Endor (the medium) was located in the Philistine-held territory, so Saul disguised himself and went “by night” (bear in mind what Jesus said in John 11:9 and 10 today:
“9Jesus answered, “Are there not twelve hours of daylight? A man who walks by day will not stumble, for he sees by this world’s light. 10It is when he walks by night that he stumbles, for he has no light.”
Isn’t it ironic that Saul would swear by the very existence of the Lord that this medium was safe from punishment, while he was in blatant disobedience to the very Levitical law that required her to be stoned?
The text clearly indicates that Samuel, not an apparition, was evident to the eyes of the medium. God miraculously permitted the actual spirit of Samuel to speak. Because she understood her inability to raise the dead in this manner, she immediately knew that it must have been by the power of God and that her disguised inquirer must be Saul.
The word translated “spirit” is actually the Hebrew word meaning “God, gods, angel, ruler, or judge.” It can also be used to designate a likeness to one of these from the medium’s perspective. Samuel appeared to be “like a spirit” ascending out of the earth. There is no other such miracle as this in all of Scripture.
Obviously age and clothing do not exist in the realm of the spirits of those who have died, but God miraculously gave such appearances so that Saul was able to perceive that the spirit was Samuel. The question arises whether all believers will remain in the form they were in when they died. Since Scripture teaches that the resurrection of the saints is yet future (Daniel 12:1,2), Samuel must have been in this condition temporarily for the benefit of Saul alone.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * *
The reading today is chalk so full of choice morsels. “All this meat and no potatoes.” *LOL*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * *
Now, this Lazarus, the brother of Mary and Martha: He was resurrected from the dead before Jesus, and the folks in the town on the day of Jesus crucifixion; “Matthew 27:51 And, behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom; and the earth did quake, and the rocks rent;
52: And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose,
53: And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many.”
What gives? I have a little difficulty with this, not that I believe scripture is wrong, but that my understanding is dull. How is it that we proclaim that Jesus is first to rise from the dead in light of the death of Lazarus, the child Elijah raised up, these folks coming out of the grave?
“Acts:26:23: That Christ should suffer, and that he should be the first that should rise from the dead, and should shew light unto the people, and to the Gentiles.
1Cor:15:20: But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that slept.
Col:1:18: And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence.”
Can someone please clarify this for me?
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * *
Alright, now finally we see that Caiaphas actually did prophesy about Jesus death in his plot to have him killed; remarkable how God uses even the bad things about our character to bring about good:
“John 11:49… Caiaphas, who was high priest that year, spoke up, “You know nothing at all! 50You do not realize that it is better for you that one man die for the people than that the whole nation perish.”
51He did not say this on his own, but as high priest that year he prophesied that Jesus would die for the Jewish nation, 52and not only for that nation but also for the scattered children of God, to bring them together and make them one. 53So from that day on they plotted to take his life.”
Bet you thought I was going to use the entire page today, huh? (Oh, I did?)
Sue
====== Lisa:
While every life has seasons of laughter and sorrow, I believe that communities do also. I just think that the times that the writers of the gospels were living in, they were more impressed by the weeping. Maybe Jesus laughed a lot in an age of sorrow. Think of the recent hard times of our own country and the depression. It shaped people’s lives. The crucification of Jesus was still fresh on their minds. I’ve heard preachers say that Jesus my have been weeping because He knew Lazarus was in God’s presence and the miracle required Lazarus to come back into a sinful environment. It is comforting to know that Jesus wept- and I believe our Father planned that we would know this. I believe that he weeps even now with us-at least we know that the Holy Spirit grieves.
Lisa
====== Art:
When I read the John passage I assumed Jesus was weeping partly because he alone *knew* that was going to be him in a very short time: a combination of natural human dread and fear at that prospect mixed together with the infinite love and power of God. Who wouldn’t weep?
As for laughing, I’m *sure* from personal experiences that God has a very good sense of humor. That said, if the majority of your children were slaves to sin and death and refused to even recognize, much less obey you, would you laugh?
Art
====== Tim:
IMHO, Samuel would have temporarily gone to the place Jesus spoke of in the parable of Lazarus & the Rich Man… only at the cross did Jesus offer anyone the chance to actually & finally go to Paradise. Even then, the dead are still awaiting the resurrection and the final fulfillment of the of the Kingdom and eternity as transformed beings as Paul tells us the dead and the living will be at Jesus 2nd appearance!
As far as this being truly Samuel appearing to Saul… even though this is a contested issue with possible evidence on either side, I tend to think that short of God suspending the usual “uncrossable gulf between the dead and the living” ala the parable of Lazarus and the Rich Man that existed even for the righteous dead, this is not Samuel, but only appears to be. I won’t go into more detail why I think that, but necromancy is called evil by the Lord, so why would God allow or practice it himself??!! There is such a thing as raising the dead back to life & there will be resurrection for all, but all the mentioning of the living being concerned with “ghosts/spirits of the dead” in the Bible is surrounded with superstition and/or evil spiritual practices…just some thoughts (sorry I did not include scripture references, but anyone can easily search these things out)
Peace
Timb
====== Kary:
No time now to expound now but…
just think about Moses & Elija coming back and talking with Jesus during the transfiguration…
And as to Mike’s question about the Lord laughing:
“He who sits in the heavens laughs….” Psalm 2:4
Kary
====== Tim:
Kary,
that is an interesting comment.. thanks for it!
A difference between Samuel and Moses & Elijah was that both of their bodies were removed from the earth or somehow contended for … I wonder if there was a reason for that?
Ramona said: “Also something to think about, if death, physical death is so atrocious for the believer, why would Samuel be upset to be called back into the land of the physical living. He said that they had disturbed him.”
There is no indication that the supposed Samuel was physical in nature… if a donkey can see an angel like Balaam’s did, even if this was a spirit, there is no body needed.
Look at the way this passage is worded. It is just like a typical modern seance… Saul sees nothing! Perhaps the “Samuel” that is speaking is the medium speaking on his behalf (falsely or not):
1 Samuel 29:
13 The king said to her, “Do not be afraid. What do you see?” And the woman said to Saul, “I see a god coming up out of the earth.” 14 He said to her, “What is his appearance?” And she said, “An old man is coming up, and he is wrapped in a robe.” And Saul knew that it was Samuel, and he bowed with his face to the ground and paid homage.
15 Then Samuel said to Saul, “Why have you disturbed me by bringing me up?”
God said that one of the reasons Saul was judged for consulting a medium… obviously he did something evil… so, is God in the necromancy business or not?
1 Chronicles 10: 13 So Saul died for his breach of faith. He broke faith with the Lord in that he did not keep the command of the Lord, and also consulted a medium, seeking guidance. 14 He did not seek guidance from the Lord. Therefore the Lord put him to death and turned the kingdom over to David the son of Jesse.
(God doesn’t seem to be laughing there!)
I think Kary’s meeting of Jesus with the 2 prophets is a completely different thing!
These kinds of passages are certainly interesting, but definitely complex!
Just more to think about in this difficult issue, that will always have 2 interpretations I am sure 😉
peace
Tim
======= Frederick:
I agree with Mike’s comments on tarot cards. In fact, we should be careful with Yoga as well.
David did not kill Saul for a second time. This makes me think of the Northern Israeli kingdom after Solomon. I the later books that we will read, we will learn that the later kings succeeded not by natural means. They murdered. I believe David set a godly example in front of God that David did not murder Saul, although he could. But that would reflected the serious sins of the later kings as they never learned from this example.
Re: 1 Samuel 27–David Among the Philistines
As Ramona said in her comments, David also sinned. He lied to the Achish son of Maok king of Gath. David is not perfect. Although he did not kill Saul just a while ago, he had not enough faith (he feared Saul) and so he went to Philistines. And he lied to the king. The bible recorded David’s lies and lack of faith.
Frederick
====== Cheryl:
I am sure that Jesus must have laughed. He spent time with children and they liked being around Him. Children like to have fun and laugh. He must have laughed. Also, look at all the funny things He created. He *must* have a sense of humor – monkeys, strange-looking animals, etc.
Cheryl
====== Raeann:
Jesus wept. This is the shortest verse in the Bible.
Raeann
====== Patty:
19″Moreover the LORD will also give over Israel along with you into the hands of the Philistines, therefore tomorrow you and your sons will be with me. Indeed the LORD will give over the army of Israel into the hands of the Philistines!”
Does this imply that Saul would be in the same place as Samuel? You and your sons. I believe that Jonathan was a rightous son.
It is quite something how the bible lines up, we get the shortest chapter of the bible, Psalm 117 and the shortest verse, “Jesus wept.”
He is the resurrection and the life; he who believes in Christ, will live even if he dies, Praise His Holy Name.
Patty
====== Marcella:
I believe Jesus laughed…because of his love for the children, he must have…kids do such funny, cute, quirky and even though they don’t realize it, insightful things. We love and laugh with our children. I believe Jesus does too.
Marcella
====== Diane:
Yes, I think Jesus laughed. He loves children and children love Him. Love of children has intrinsic laughter, joy and pleasure. Our Saviour is the positive force in the universe, He created it, He has to have a sense of humour.
Diane
====== Joyce:
Mike and everyone,
Mike – thank you for pointing out the verse: “Jesus wept.” (John 11:35 NIV).
i’ve spent the day on and off looking up commentaries and sermons regarding this verse.
came across this story to share:
‘A mission executive from the United States was visiting a school in Kenya where he was listening as teenage girls shared how they had been blessed by hearing the Bible in their own language. One girl testified that the verse that had the greatest impact on her was Matthew 5:4, “Blessed are those who mourn, for they will be comforted.” Another said that the verse that had the greatest impact on her was John 11:35, “Jesus wept.” She said that when she wept in the night, she knew that Jesus was weeping with her.
The mission executive wondered why these two girls were mourning and weeping. He thought that maybe they had chosen these verses to share because they were short and easy to remember. But the school’s teacher leaned over and whispered to him that both of these girls had lost their parents to AIDS. Jesus’ compassion comforted them in their losses.’ (from
Bible.org, Lesson 62:The Teacher’s Tears, John 11:28-37, Steven J Cole)
Father, thank You that through Jesus’ word and His life, You’ve let us know, that You are a God of compassion. You rejoice when we are happy, and weep when we are sad. Thank You for the blessing and privilege in believing in You. in Jesus’ name, amen.
Sincerely,
Joyce
====== Alan:
Thank you Ramona. My wife of nearly 19 years just [assed away April 10 of this year and I believe, absent from the body, present with the Lord. We get our resurrected bodies after the tribulation, that 1000 years Jesus will be on this earth. Praise the Lord from whom all blessings flow. The Holy Spirit is helping me get better every day.
Alan
====== Imja:
Jesus was fully divine and fully human. He went through everything we experienced. This is what makes it so easy for us to come to Him. He understands our humanity while fully being God. Which makes me believe he had to have a good laugh too! Because, He loves being with all people and children. That fact alone had to have had many comical moments! Even now, I’m positive we make him laugh, He brings me joy daily!
Imja
====== Sam:
There may be no record of Jesus ever laughing, but I suspect He did… pretty often. After all, look at the disciples He was surrounded with!
Sam
====== Dee:
Wow..witches..spirits and mediums in 1 Samuel..bad on Saul..he wasn’t very aware of the power of prayer and of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. He just knew he was not anointed anymore. His time to shine is dwindling down and he is desperate. However he knows that David is the promised one to be on the throne next.
I just always think wow for John 11. To have a friend like Jesus in those times visit in flesh and blood and weep over me(which I know we have this relationship now when we surrender and ask him in our heart) but I still say wow! Lazarus being Risen from the grave. Jesus wept. Wow!
Sweet short verses on other two..Allalejuh verses.
Dee